The role of dental and medical professionals
After an informed public that is knowledgeable about the risk factors for oral cancer, the dental community is the first line of defense in early detection of the disease. Including both generalists and specialists, there are over 100,000 dentists in the US, each one seeing between 8 and 15 patients per day. If you include those patients who come to a practice and see someone other than the dentist, such as the hygienist, the number of patient visits is significantly higher. The American Dental Association states that 60% of the US population sees a dentist every year. Just doing "opportunistic" cancer screenings of the existing patient population which visits a dental office every day, would yield tens of thousands of opportunities to catch oral cancer in its early stages. One of our goals is to initiate an effort within the dental community to aggressively screen all of the patients who visit their practices. At the same time we are launching a public awareness campaign. This campaign is intended to drive public awareness of oral cancer, and to instill in the publics mind the need for an annual screening for this disease. One only has to look at the impact of the annual PAP smear, mammogram, and prostate exam, to see how effectively an aware and involved public can contribute to early detection, when coupled with a motivated medical community. The dental community needs to assume this same leadership role if oral cancer is to be brought down from its undeserved high ranking as a killer.
Published studies show that currently less than 15% of those who visit a dentist regularly, report having had an oral cancer screening. This is unfortunate, when you consider that historically, the greatest strides in combating most cancers have come from increased awareness and aggressive campaigns directed at early detection. It is now commonplace to annually get a PAP smear for cervical cancer, a mammogram to check for breast cancer, or PSA and digital rectal exams for prostate cancer. These screening efforts have been possible as a result of the increased public awareness of the value of catching cancers in their earliest forms, combined with effective technologies for conducting the examinations. Oral cancer is no different. Actually, it is potentially easier to obtain public compliance for oral cancer screenings, since unlike many other cancer screening procedures, there is no invasive technique necessary to look for it, no discomfort or pain involved, and it is very inexpensive to have your mouth examined for the early signs of disease. Education of the public regarding the risk factors which lead to oral cancer, and the development of public awareness, are primary responsibilities of the dental community.
It is important that both private individuals, and members of the dental community, realize that a visit to the dentist is no longer about a filling, a crown, or a postponable cleaning, but is actually a matter of life and death. Dental examinations, when properly done and which include a screening for oral cancer, will save lives. If you are a dental professional, we encourage you to become a member of the foundation, and partner with us in this effort to increase the number of annual screenings which are being done. We can provide you with materials such as waiting room brochures which explain to your patients the risk factors and early signs and symptoms of the disease, as well as help them realize the importance of opportunistic annual screenings.
Discovery and diagnosis
Historically, it has been difficult to determine which abnormal tissues in the mouth are worthy of concern. The fact is, the average person routinely has conditions existing in their mouths that mimic the appearance of pre-cancerous changes, and very early cancers of the soft tissues. One study determined that the average dentist sees 3-5 patients a day who exhibit soft tissue abnormalities, most of which are benign in nature. Even the simplest things, such as a canker sore (herpes simplex), the wound left by accidentally biting the inside of your cheek, or sore spots from a poorly fitting prosthetic appliance or denture, all at first examination, share similarities with dangerous lesions. Some of these conditions cause physical discomfort, others are painless. The question is which ones deserve action, and which ones bear watching and waiting?
There has been a tendency to watch these areas over an extended period to determine if they are dangerous or not. Unfortunately, this philosophy leads to a situation in which a dangerous lesion may continue to prosper and grow into a later stage, hard to cure cancer. Any sore, discoloration, induration, prominent tissue, irritation, hoarseness, which does not resolve within a two week period on its own, with or without treatment, should be considered suspect and worthy of further examination or referral.
Besides a routine visit to the dental office for regular examinations, it is the patient's responsibility to be aware of changes in their oral environment. When these changes occur, they need to be brought to the attention of a qualified dental professional for examination. The dental professional needs to be current in the knowledge base necessary to make a proper diagnosis, and be competent in the proper screening procedures to identify oral cancer. At the very least, persistent abnormalities need to be identified by the general dental population and sent for referral and biopsy if the referring doctors feels it warranted.
There are two separate issues, discovery and diagnosis. Discovery is the result of a thorough visual and manual examination. A protocol for a comprehensive oral cancer screening appears elsewhere in this section of the web site. It includes a systematic visual examination of all the soft tissues of the mouth, including manual extension of the tongue to examine its base, a bimanual palpation of the floor of the mouth, a digital examination of the borders of the tongue, and the lymph nodes surrounding the oral cavity and in the neck. New diagnostic aids, including lights, dyes, and other techniques are beginning to appear on the marketplace. Some of these have more value than others and stronger scientific efficacy. While potentially making the discovery process more effective, it is still possible to do a comprehensive examination through a proper visual and tactile process alone. For that matter, in the foundation's opinion the use of these devices without conducting a thorough visual and tactile examination will not yield adequate results, and is not recommended. These are adjuncts to the visual an tactile exam, NOT replacements for it.
Once suspect tissues have been detected, the only way a definitive diagnosis of oral cancer may be made is through biopsy. Given the large number of tissue abnormalities a dentist sees every day, it is not logical, nor practical, that each one of these be biopsied. The first question which may help in the determination of which abnormality bears closer examination, is how long has the suspect condition been present? Any condition that has existed for 14 days or more without resolution should be considered suspect and worthy of further diagnostic procedures or referral. Certainly, it is common knowledge that two of the most prevalent lesions that mimic oral cancer, are the herpes simplex ulceration, and aphthous ulcerations, each resolving of their own accord in approximately 10-14 days. Perhaps that sentence should be underlined, since one of the most common diagnoses received with referred patients to a major university cancer pathology department is "an atypical herpetic/aphthous lesion" These all too frequently turn out to be squamous cell carcinomas, which have been under observation.... for several months. There are other common guidelines such as the fact that oral cancer seldom, if ever, presents bilaterally in the oral environment, nor do they routinely appear on the midline. These are not absolutes, but may aid in the the determination of what is worthy of immediate concern.
The only conclusive manner to determine if a suspect lesion is dangerous is through a biopsy. Event he most trained eyes cannot determine what is actually going on on the cellular level. Is it a lesion that has become dysplastic? Is that dysplasia high grade and a likely candidate for progression to malignancy? Only a biopsy performed, and read by an oral pathologist will reveal the answer.
Some advocate for the decision to be made through a brush cytology cell collection to determine risk. A oral biopsy brush is available that makes this decision to get an more conclusive conventional biopsy easier to make. But it does add time to the equation. Any positive found through brush cytology must be confirmed by conventional incisional or punch biopsy.
Note that this system is not designed to provide the kind of information, specifically cellular architecture, that would be obtained through a punch or incisional biopsy. But it will provide an answer to the question of whether risk exists or not, through a quick, minimally invasive, and inexpensive procedure. Should positive results be returned through this system, the brush biopsy must be followed by a conventional biopsy procedure for confirmation. The argument for the brush biopsy is that it eliminates the waiting and watching of a suspicious lesion, while it develops from a highly treatable and curable, early stage localized cancer, into a life threatening late stage malignancy. Positive identification of oral cancers at the earliest stages, result in the best prognosis for cure and long-term survivability. The foundation is not opposed to this multi step system of determining patient risk. However, referral to a specialist, such as an oral surgeon, adds another informed opinion to the process, and involves now a professional that routinely does conventional biopsy. There is a second issue of transfer of liability for prompt and appropriate diagnosis to the doctor on the receiving end of the referral, which may be attractive to the generalist who is less trained in recognizing which lesions are high risk.
Professional guide to incisional biopsy. Refer it or do it? An overview of procedures to help you decide.
For general dental practitioners OCF believes your responsibility is at minimum creating awareness, and being involved in opportunistic discovery of suspect tissue through routine screening of your entire patient population, and referral for second opinion or biopsy when appropriate. For dental specialists such as oral surgeons and periodontists, as well as oral medicine specialists, it is providing second opinions, and when requested or when you believe necessary, performing biopsy of any suspect area. Once confirmation of disease by the pathologist is obtained, referral of the patient to a proper medical institution or medical professional oncologist is also part of the dental professions responsibility.
While this process creates a continuous chain of custody and referral during the discovery and diagnostic process, patients will continue to need your help as they prepare for treatment and for management of oral issues before treatment may begin, as well as during and after the treatment process. When it comes to oral cancer and saving lives, these are the primary responsibilities of the dental community. The most important step in reducing the death rate from oral cancer is early discovery. No group has a better opportunity to have a positive impact on this than members of the dental community.
Start a dialog with your patients today. Even if talking about cancer with them is difficult, there are mechanisms around this. Take a look at the dialog buttons in the OCF store. They are a simple tool to help you begin the conversation with your patients.